Automation, Airmanship and Bombardier Safety Standdown


Airmanship in the balance


Almost 70 years ago, one of the earliest commercially available computers was delivered to the US Government by the Remington Rand Corporation, the UNIVAC-1. The joke that circulated for years afterward goes like this:

A bunch of scientists created a huge machine capable of complex calculations and called it UNIVAC. Eager to test their invention, they asked it, “Is there a God?” The vacuum tubes hummed and the tape spools spun for several minutes. Finally, the machine spit out a little card, on which was written, “THERE IS NOW.”

Underlying the most visible aviation accidents of the 21st century has been the notional idea that contemporary flight crews have grown increasingly dependent on technology and automation to the exclusion of airmanship. In response, regulators and oversight organizations, aviation businesses, manufacturers, academics and aviation journalists have taken up the cause, in search of an answer to this publicly declared imbalance between human and machine. Their early conclusions have been divided between calls for more technology, and calls for less.

Contemporary flight crews – so often left out of the discussion, remain the last line of defense between all of the forces of nature and technology that bear down on us every time we get into the cockpit. It doesn’t matter how much automation is added or how much oversight is placed on flight crews, it’s the crew that ultimately makes the critical decision at the critical time: whether to continue an unstable approach, or to go-around; if it’s safer to divert to an alternate, or to press on to the planned destination as weather minimums begin to plummet; whether to accept a clearance from ATC that requires unusually demanding airmanship, or to opt for an alternative that adds time to the flight leg but is clearly safer.

Maintaining the appropriate balance between automatic control and human intervention is without argument one of the most important front-line skills of modern aviators. If you or your organization has not thought long and hard about the relationship between the human operator and the technology in use, then perhaps you should set the brake and reconsider how technology and automation fit into your SOPs, proficiency checks, and the daily personal practice of airmanship. This has been a hallmark of the Bombardier Safety Standdown ethos for 22 years; and that’s why the event has sought out the best experts in the field of automation and human performance, so that they could bring their knowledge and experience to every Safety Standdown participant.

Computational technology has come a long way from the UNIVAC-1 in just 67 years. During that timeframe, we’ve witnessed changes in the way flight operations are managed and executed that few would have thought possible in 1951. What began as uncertainty in the early days of computer design has become an essential aviation tool, with specific roles divided between the hardware & software and the “wetware” of the human operator.

Ungoverned by airmanship, technology and automation are only powerful forces that modern engineering and manufacturing have turned loose in the cockpit. Maintaining an appropriate balance between the hardware, software and the wetware takes discipline and requires purpose – both easily overlooked in the day-to-day competitive, fast-paced and high risk endeavor we are all part of. Staying connected to Bombardier Safety Standdown network of professionals—whether through participation in annual events (in person or via webcast) or through this website, will help you improve your performance in the fast-paced, rapidly changing world of contemporary aviation.

Chris Lutat, author of “Automation Airmanship” and member of the Bombardier Safety Standdown Advisory Council, 2016-2019.


Chris Lutat 

Convergent Performance, LLC

Read more


What If Your Own Story Changed The World?

Safety Standdown has a very simple but effective recipe to keep safety a top priority year-round: Learn. Apply. Share.

This three-prong approach is crucial for developing personal accountability. Doing each of those actions individually is helpful, but it’s the combination of Learning, Applying and Sharing, that elevates safety efforts to the next level of professionalism.

This concept is effective because experiences and stories stay stronger in the mind than informational statements because the context is visualized. You are more likely to remember a detailed story of a near-miss, rather than a statistic regarding degrees of error threats in various stages of the flight.

In line with our on-going theme of Attention Control Techniques, we challenge you to be conscious of when you are learning new material or skills, applying it for the first time, and then sharing it with your colleagues. You may be surprised at how often you do it in everyday life.

20 Years of Learning Applying Sharing 640x111

Professional experience makes us wiser through every challenge we overcome.  Take these experiences one step further and share them with your peers, who are likely to face similar issues.

Trending safety topics:

Those are just a few examples of human factors risks worth discussing. Now it’s your turn to start a conversation! Tell us what you learned, applied, and shared recently.

Share Your Story

The Normalization of Excellence. Sounds cool – what is it?


Gotta tell you, I was thrilled when I first heard that the Bombardier Safety Standdown was adopting a concept from one of my books as the theme for 2018. Then I started to worry. We all love cool sounding themes … (more…)

The Normalization of Excellence


The theme for Safety Standdown 2018 is the Normalization of Excellence. At first glance, these words may seem contradictory, after all, excellence isn’t normal, it’s exceptional. Excellence is achieved by the best of the best – it wins Super Bowls … (more…)

What Does “Intentionally Safe” Mean?


What does it mean to be “intentionally” safe? “Intentional” implies that you go beyond a basic level of safety because of an effort you are making. Safe means the mitigation of risk, which in aviation can be subjective based on … (more…)

Choosing to be Intentionally Safe


As a demonstration pilot, my job is to travel the world to show our aircraft to prospective customers and operators – easily the best job in the world. One of the things I like best is the opportunity to meet … (more…)

Don’t Just Fill Out Forms


FRAT, HIT, OSR, Safety Report, Hazard Report, CMP, Safety Risk Profile, Abnormality Report, NASA, FOM Waiver, FOM Deviation, Continuous Improvement Report, ……..must I continue? “Everything was going pretty well for the past twenty years, why create all this paperwork?” / … (more…)

A Change of Perspective


Safety Standdown has changed my perspective. I am not a pilot, but I have been involved with Safety Standdown since 2002.  Over this time, I have had the opportunity to be exposed to the information that Dr. Jerome Berlin presents … (more…)

Share and Share Alike


We are always looking for ways to help others see the value of sharing Safety Standdown with the world. An interview, a story or even a comment serves to build sentiment and support our efforts in bringing a Safety Standdown … (more…)



I recently had the pleasure of attending my 6th Standdown. I want to thank you all for your personal commitment to aviation safety. I also wish to commend Bombardier for their willingness to “put their money where their mouth is” … (more…)

Help Wanted: Perfection Required.


The Bombardier Safety Standdown USA 2012 is just days away! The 16th annual Safety Standdown is shaping up to be another banner year in the effort to reduce accidents due to human error. The message from Safety Standdown is; it … (more…)

Safety Standdown Latin America


It were an incredible opportunity to learn and recall, what really care [matters] in aviation’s world: Safety and Professionalism. Likely, everybody made the same of me [felt the same way] and reconsidered their acts, trying to be best everyday and … (more…)

← Older posts